Will you tell me why
a government with power
to create money
should give that power away
to a private monopoly
and then borrow
that which Parliament
can create itself
back at interest
to the point
of national bankruptcy?
the first Governor
of the Bank of Canada
replied:
If Parliament wants to change
the form of operating
the banking system
then certainly that is within
the power of Parliament
Our sovereign has demonstrated
a preference for private investors
In doing so our sovereign
has permitted Parliament
to commit extortion
and racketeering
Extortion is committed
when the penalty
for not paying income tax
includes fines and jail time
when Parliament
rather than borrowing
at interest
negating the need
for income tax
Racketeering is committed
when intimidation and fraud
are present
There is no court
that binds contracts
which were gained
through extortion
and racketeering
The people of Canada
therefore
are not liable for sovereign debt
incurred through extortion
and racketeering by Parliament
The graph and auditor general's remarks
informs us that 91% of our federal budget
is interest paid out
for previously borrowed money
The 'flip side' of the 91% being interest
is that when we walk away
from our sovereign debt
due to the debt being incurred
through extortion and racketeering
our budget will be 91% SMALLER
Without changing anything else
our taxes will be reduced by 91%
The uprising of 2023
is the uprising we will feel
when our debt burden is lifted
It is a new day
for the people of Canada
Copyright: Guy Hawkins Powell River BC Canada 2023 reposted under Fair Use Doctrine - news - research - education - commentary
edited for clarity 26/03/23
edited for clarity 28/03/23